Search:

photoshop photoshop tutorials graphic design trade show design

THIS MONTH'S SPECIALS

MIT Engineer Disputes 911 Theory of the WTC Collapse-Part 1

Help With Acne
Help With Acne Help With Acne
Help With Acne

MIT Engineer Jeff King's logical look at the official story of the WTC collapse

Channel: News & Politics
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: muzicmaker2001

Length: 06:13
Rating: 4.42
Views: 64635

Tags: 9/11  911  collapse  conspiracy  fema  nist  nyc  theory  wtc  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

1Nyro (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Satanism, not judaism.
koford (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Haha, u dont no for sure.
samgee2007 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
9/11 was started by jews 1 you fucking christians
skizombie (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
bleu Great question.. Whatch 9/11 WTC North Tower Exploding What did happen the 47 massive steel vertical core columns? Look at pics of the construction of the towers....the columns are fricken HUGE... They look like they were just pulverized.
originbleu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
question for any meturlagists/structural engs.what is the maximum velocity the supporting columns could withstand given the planes were made of aluminium against rienforced steel?as we witnessed in Madrid fire cannot buckle let alone melt such material even a H-bomb dropped in the centre of manhattan would'nt have caused as much damage as the two jets.The problem I am struggling with is how the columns without being severed at the base could have failed on such a scale. Perhaps subsidance?
whalefish83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
follow the money.
smegov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
and a wick is what you nead to keep a fire burning that is fueled buy kerosene ..other than that you have to heat it up alot to get the stuff to burn,both towers had airconditioning...so they were quite cool at the time of the crash..
smegov (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The NTSB investigation ended with the adoption of its final report on August 23, 2000. In it they concluded that the probable cause of the accident was an explosion of the center wing fuel tank, most likely as a result of faulty wiring.the wiring created the flashpiont,yes the engines on the air crafts that hit the towers,were hot,thous creating the fire ball that we saw,the building would have been cool the fuel would have cooled down and gone out,what wickeffect was in the elevator shafts?
timeforbloodywar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
flash point is easily reached..look at TWA flight 800..it reached flashpoint and exploded in mid-air but i dont know what the wick effect is..mind explaining it to me? also how do u explain Frank Martini reporting on the 78th floor of tower 1 that the elevator shafts were at risk of collapse?
timeforbloodywar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
watch the naudet brothers documentary and i know flaming jet fuel creates a fire thats why i asked the conspiracy theorists how the person/people caught on fire just 2 minutes after the tower was hit

Free Photoshop Videos and Tutorials © 2007 All Rights Reserved.