Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Manichaean paranoia. I'd look it up if I were you.

MICHAELMEM (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The Bible actually gives us a hint about why atheists care about religion. I think the following is not an exact quotation, but the idea is still true: "All people who will live Godly (in Christ Jesus) WILL also be persecuted." Atheists prosecute those who live Godly in Christ; and I doubt atheists would prosecute so much if they did not really care about religion.

Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Quoting the Bible to prove the Bible's truth to us is not going to get you very far.

Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Wrong, wrong, and again, wrong. You are confusing truth and fact YET AGAIN. This conversation is NOT PROGRESSING and it won't progress until you acknowledge the difference between the two.

believer777believer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

You are using dietary law, that has nothing at all to do with moral law. God also said in Acts 10:15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common. So, anything blessed by God is not considered unclean. Gods moral law is located in Exodus 20.

believer777believer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I lost track of where your comments were. I suppose you've never had that problem? This vid has an extesive amount of commenrs to sift through. I was never on any hook yo begin with. I am free, completely.

believer777believer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Fact is determined by truth. It cannot be fact without absolute truth. They are not mutally inclusive. If truth is relative,then facts must be relative also. Which we know not to be true. I only used physics to illustrate that truth is not relative,that it must be an absolute constant,in order for anything to exist as it does. Philosophy says all truth is relative. That is clearly ridiculous! Maybe the philosophers,should have taken some physics classes.

Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Learn the difference between truth and fact. Why do you think courts demand the truth, but not fact from witnesses? Because witnesses can only honestly give their perception of events, be they accurate or inaccurate. Physics determine FACT, not 'truth'. It is a fact that the Earth revolves around the Sun. It is a RELATIVE 'truth' that shellfish is an 'abomination' according to Leviticus 11:10.

Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Oh, and nice try at avoiding me by not clicking 'reply' to any of my comments. But just because I don't get notified of your response doesn't mean you're off the hook.

Sorastor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Morals are neither definite nor absolute, and you have no base to say that this is my supposition alone. 'Physics' do not demonstrate that moral or ethical absolutes must exist, but simply show that physical, testable, objective absolute FACT does exist. FACT is absolute; truth is relative, as even a court of law would tell you. There is a distinction between the two. The fact: I exist. The truth to you: I am a heretic. The truth to me: I'm awesome (which could be fact, also).