|
tdtd98 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Michael buble is just a cover singer with huge noise around him! And he can't pair great voice such as johnny mathis or perry como and others! Cause his voice is casual and common and can't hold a note! Buble mean faker and impostor i wonder how he might sound like without auto tune on? What a louse! Compared to tony he is just a joke!
wrangloctopus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
oh im feeling this one. kick it back and soak it up up and away baby. Swingin and shakin that groove now thats some spicy stuff.
ThatsBoyz79 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
right! im with you on this one mad people hate on him hes awesome. if the people ripping on him could sing better than him then they would be singin with Tony. jealousy.
Latintrumpete (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
dude music is not sport. 'Who is better?' That is not important thing. Just enjoy music man.
bbudacious (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
so smooth. Let's dance
rberger22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I just don't get the hate for Buble...the guy can certainly sing better than 99.999% of the population yet some of you can't help ripping the guy for some strange reason. This from someone who is simply a casual Buble observer.
tdtd98 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
To eaches own! But michael buble as a singer he is a big joke! He sing off pitch even with auto tune on! What a louse! He can't pair tony bennett and he got a pussy voice! Michael feinstein is the best now! Buble is just a karaoke singer and it was a bip mistake of bennett to sing with him! He sucks and so does his bullshiter fans!
kaleighrae91 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yah he is!
endgiver (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
yee he's not better than sinatra he's just today's crooner. He's fantastic though.
iworkforme (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
clever marketing and a great voice = Buble. time and style were dead on.
he could sing anything. he's not lost in time but playing classic stuff. can't lose the classics. |
