|
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (October 7, 2008 at 2:34 am)
Erech01 "life cannot come from inorganic matter. 60's experiments show RNA and DNA can form naturally."
More lies from Satan's knight lying for evolution and obedience to the father of lies who is Satan.
No human has made RNA or DNA or life of any sort with there intelligence. You are totally misrepresenting the results of experiments which are all failures and certainly NOT Naturalistic. STOP LYING ATHEIST.
Renfield37 (October 7, 2008 at 2:16 am)
ah, no... everything had a beginning..
they did not always exist, you just have to & want to think they did,no one said anything about santa clause, santa clause is a figmant like evolutionism is
Renfield37 (October 7, 2008 at 2:13 am)
actually.. life can only be created by a creator.. with out God, there is nothing.
it dont just come about on its own with any complexity. and no, those " experiments "
did nothing to create anything
Zamusse (October 7, 2008 at 12:37 am)
Hey guys come watch our videos there funny you'll laugh :)
&& subscribee!! :D we appreciate it
Erech01 (October 6, 2008 at 11:34 pm)
'Where do you believe life arose from then'
most likly the oceans, many compounds which are thought to have been the basis for early primative life are found in there and near places where the right condiitions for life are.
'Do you have your own theory seperate from mainstream theorists? '
no, im not nearly qualified enough to come up with my own model, the above is an extremly simplified of what the mainstream is, not mud or rocks as the morons at CSE and AiG would have you believe.
Erech01 (October 6, 2008 at 11:31 pm)
'The Miller experiments were the first ones (or most famous) if I recall.'
im not reffering to the miller experiments, im reffering to experiments conducted by Juan Oro (the 60's ones) and more recently Dr. Szostak of harvard medical school, incase you didnt notice, miller experiments were conducted in the 50's, not the 60's.
here are some videos regarding the origins of life:
/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg
/watch?v=ozbFerzjkz4
and if you care to look im sure there are afew more
ericinnit1 (October 6, 2008 at 11:26 pm)
The Miller experiments were the first ones (or most famous) if I recall.
The video named "Evolution vs Creation : # 6 Chemical Evolution" talks about it (which you can find in my favourites).
Where do you believe life arose from then? Do you have your own theory seperate from mainstream theorists?
Erech01 (October 6, 2008 at 11:17 pm)
the ones i am talking about are very valid.
Erech01 (October 6, 2008 at 11:14 pm)
'If you want to believe it arose by itself from mud, then go ahead.'
i will, but i dont beleive life came from mud, a rock, swamps, goop, gunge or any other bullsh*t you can come up with;)
'Those 60s experiments were not valid, they used the wrong conditions, got the wrong results, among other things. They were debunked years ago, where have you been? '
what 60's experiments were you talking about?
ericinnit1 (October 6, 2008 at 11:12 pm)
I know saying life came from mud is not better than saying it came from God. I stand by my claim that it came from God. If you want to believe it arose by itself from mud, then go ahead.
Those 60s experiments were not valid, they used the wrong conditions, got the wrong results, among other things. They were debunked years ago, where have you been? |
