|
RadicalProbability (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If you mean he is wrong to think you can divorce intelligence from the physical body and from the emotions and still get intelligence; I am right there. How much of our understanding and predictions are weighted and triggered by emotional content, by sensory memories of touch, smell, sound; in short all the things managed superbly by the complex and ancient brain beneath the neocortex?
pathwayStudios (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Proof that smart people can be dumb too...
Passionate...
Educated...
totaly clueless.
Thundralight (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think as computers become more advanced we will understand a lot more of how our brain works as computers are mimicing our own brains as they are a projection of our own mind.
Hallibutbouy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Very interesting, I find him fresh, well motivated and targeting the right areas.
However, it is a pitty that all nueroscientists and modern philosophers of mind that I have come accross are ignorant of the body and its relationship with the world.
A brain makes no mind without a body and the bodies existence is entirely determined by its interaction with the world.
Good Luck!
mlcrazi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hawkins' theory on intelligence seems quite similar to Hecht-Nielsen's Confabulation Theory. I took his graduate neurocomputing class and we programmed systems that have similar memory/comparison/prediction to what Hawkins is saying.
bananian (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
he's disproving Descartes! NOooooo!!!! :)
batukhan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Why only 30 000 people have watched this?
AuthenticPunkDance (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
He said C3PO wrong!
But that's about the only bad thing he said. :)
luzic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
He's so passionate!
Apsychowar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
He's the best! |
