|
pitbull103 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Evolution is not accepted by the teachers? Virtually every reputable biology professor in America can point to the massive evidence for evolution. The fact that I have to write this in this day and age is a sad statement in itself. Science bases its conclusions on evidence. New evidence leads to new conclusions. The basis of religion is old texts that do not change. Hmmm. Which sounds like a better way to reach conclusions? If you don't know the answer, you have problems.
Alcavexus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They are 4% atheist, 14% agnostic this is a statistic from 2006, i can't find 2008..so i dont know if these numbers changed.
Alcavexus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
where?
gmcjetpilot (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I can't find your post, but I don't hate atheist, some are nice. I hate hate, I hate intollrance and mean people and those come in all shapes and sizes and even so called Christians. So there, Brother, peace and stop thinking bad of relgion, some very very good people are religious and would give you the shirt off their back, even knowing you're a self professed atheist. Your not an atheist, just confused & looking for something IMHO. The state of NO belief is unnatural & this video is drivel.
sonykroket (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That's why you're the laughing stock of the planet right now.
You do know the earth isn't flat, right?
akan65 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hardly in fact evolution is hardly accepted by the public here. Even the teachers that teach it hardly buy it. In other words Christianity is still very strong over here.
XGralgrathor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
« Truth? no. »
Science doesn't deal in "Truth." Science proposes testable explanations for observations. The supernatural is not testable. Therefore science offers no supernatural explanations. *You* may; just don't call it science.
XGralgrathor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
« Christians object to BAD science, lies, propaganda »
Yet a small group of christians (called creationists) actually proposes to bring religion into science classes.
XGralgrathor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
« Evolution is a pseudoscience »
No, evolution is the result of scientific methodology applied to biology.
« (with lots of dogma) »
Sigh... Such as?
XGralgrathor (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
« but creationism/ID/theist-evolutio n might get a mention because ITS in the science »
Ehr, no. Science does not comment on the supernatural. Creationism/ID do.
« which admits ORDER is too great »
Ehr, no. Science tries to *explain* order, it doesn't claim it's "too big" or "too small". |