BrianTheMusicMan (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Anarchism isn't skeptical enough, I don't think. Even though it is critical of other governments, it isn't very self-critical. It just seems to assume and hope that things will "work out". It also presupposes reasonable behavior, Socratic Justice (everyone minding their own business), abolition of crime, abolition of scarcity, abolition of manipulation, abolition of unreasonable hatred, abolition of fraud, and so on. Anarchism seems like a product of hope, not of pragmatic inquiry.

LifeLibertyLove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

hahahaha that's called socialism.

CodyAllenmusic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The community! That is what I am saying bro. If someone starts to dictate as you said, then the community rises,and for the good cause, and prevention of total dictatorship, and take down the person "rising to power"

LifeLibertyLove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

So what prevents me from earning more money then someone else buying out businesses and creating my own feudal government?

LifeLibertyLove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Hahaha!

CodyAllenmusic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Anarchism Is certainly not Dictatorship. Anarchism= NO LEADERS. If one leader pops up, we as a community take them down.

confederalsocialist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Skepticism is immoral.

brainpolice2 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

That claim is absurd. Anarchism and dictatorship are practically polar opposites, and anarchism is NOT to be confused with violent democratic revolutions to take over the state.

LifeLibertyLove (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Anarchism is just a transition to a dictatorship. Feudalism will always happen you will always have someone with more power.

CodyAllenmusic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Idk what happened.. I cant see my prior comment and don't remember exactly what I said.. But yes, I know what feudalism is. And we are more less a feudalist society right now if you think about it.